Skip to main content

Plyco New Product Development - Bringing Victory Vinyl Windows to Life

Plyco is a recognized name in construction. Their aluminum windows have been a go-to product for post-frame builders and contractors for decades. As times and materials change, however,  the industry requests more choices and Plyco strives to please. They are on the brink of delivering their new window line to the post-frame world. But what does it take to get a new product line to this jumping off point?

It Begins With An Idea

With vinyl becoming more popular, management began realizing several years ago that their customers would be interested in a vinyl line. However, vinyl had traditionally been a lower quality window choice, and that was not what they had in mind, according to Tom Granitz, Vice President of Sales Marketing. They wanted a line they could be proud of. Of course, when contemplating new product development, one of the first things a company usually does is talk to their customers, and that is what they did.

“We spent a lot of time homing in on the exact product that was right for our customers, based on the details of what they think, want, and need,” Granitz said.

That contemplation period began approximately three years ago. It wasn’t until about a year and a half later that they made a commitment to developing this new line. Once that happened, the move forward was multi-faceted.

It’s a Go!…Now What?

The Plyco team had many pieces of the puzzle to fit together once they decided to embark on this journey. They started by looking at products the competition had in the marketplace, considering their pros and cons and comparing them to the wish list they had compiled based on discussions with their customers.

Functions requested by customers Included horizontal and vertical slider as well as fixed windows. White, clay and the Increasingly popular black were color options that were specified. As far as trim, many customers wanted the popular Step-Saver option along with the traditional nail fin and no nail fin options.

With all of this information in mind, they began to investigate product components, such as high quality dies, and frame composition. Quality in the frame is driven by the extruder and the chemistry, including the amount of recycled material and all the Titanium dioxide content which helps keep the color true due to its ability to act as a UV filtering ingredient. The chemical makeup they wanted would have good color retention, and wouldn’t warp or crack over time.

The Check List

The development team had to find an  extruder that provided the quality they were looking for and it was important to everyone involved that the supply chain did not extend to far shores, which, the industry has seen in the last few years, can complicate processes. The company found what they were looking for with Rehau, North America. They are a German, multi-national company with a manufacturing plant in Mexico.

Plyco’s engineering department, under Al Geisthart, created CAD drawings based on Rehau’s drawings, adjusting for the post frame industry and engineering for the sizes they planned to offer.

Since the extrusions would come in a lineal form, 188” long, the team had to look at what equipment they would need. These included three main types of equipment: accurate saws, welding-melting for rebonding corners, and a computer-controlled cleaner  that cleans up welding residue. Each of these items needed to be researched, decided upon, and purchased. Meanwhile the facility staff had to start preparing the space for these new processes.

Then  there is the question of who can run these processes. Employees had to be sourced.

When the new machinery came in, the group had to calibrate, program, and learn how to use them.

Once all of these pieces came together, the next step was…

Testing…1, 2, 3

“When it comes to testing,” Granitz said, “what people are interested in is a third party, an Independent testing company who verifies that what you say about your product is true, so that is our usual procedure with most of our Plyco product lines.”

Window testing standards are accredited by the AAMA (American Architectural Manufacturers Association).  This creates a level playing field for companies, both big and small, to have their windows accredited. All windows face the same testing criteria. Third party testing groups come into the facility and test the windows to verify that they meet the criteria for the class of window in question. The Quality control process Is verifies In the plant and Is done according to defined criteria.

Each window type has a defined “gateway” set of minimum requirements for each performance class: R(residential), LC(Light Commercial), CW (Commercial Windows), or AW(Architectural Windows). They must achieve minimum performance grades for air leakage resistance, water penetration resistance, uniform load.

One of the critical tests is the window’s U-value; how well does the window prevent the movement of cold or heat through the window. In general, this rating can vary from .20 to 1.20, the lower the U-Value the better. Overall performance and the window’s center are tested.

Structural performance of the frame is tested for bending, breaking, and bowing.

Once trim packages are applied, AAMA’s CS 101 testing is redone on the windows to determine air and water infiltration based on applied pressure in pounds per square foot.

Windows are mounted in a wall and air is sucked through while readings are taken to determine how much air passes through. The water test is a similar process; water is applied along with air pressure to determine how well the window will keep water out.  

The structural test simulates wind gusts of over 110 miles per hour.

Of course, different products will have differing requirements and expenses attached, but... Geisthart warned, “ testing is costly and extensive.”


One of the most challenging aspects of this process was  time spent waiting for equipment needed for cutting, welding, and punching.

Originally the management team expected a 6-9 month time period to develop, test, and get their new product line on the market. Eighteen months later, Granitz attributes supply chain issues  as the biggest reason for the delay.

The pool of available employees is challenging for everyone at this point in time, but when you are trying to launch a whole new product line, you simply have to source more people.

Granitz says that the labor pool is pretty small to begin with, and what makes it extra challenging is that you are looking for someone who is not just going to show up and do the minimum necessary; you need someone who will be engaged. While the equipment automates a lot of the work, you still need someone who calibrates machinery, cuts material, does quality inspections, and does these things well. You want people who will not skip steps, someone who takes pride in a job well done.

Plyco’s expectations for new-hires does help them to meet their goals. They assume that none of their new  employees will have experience with window manufacturing; they take people who want to work and train them into the positions they need.

Timeline Advice

Part of a successful rollout is planning, and Granitz feels that timelines are different since all of the supply chain issues and labor pool issues began.  

“If you think something will take 30 days, plan for 60. If we had factored these things in, we’d be right on time.”

About to Take the Leap

The Victory Vinyl Window Line is just about ready to make its debut. It was shown at the NFBA Show, so some customers are aware and demand is starting to build. Granitz says that they are going to take the release easy, as in they will probably start with limited sizes and trim packages to begin with, and maybe just a few colors. Some sizes and colors are currently being pre-built, but they do not know how long this stock will last and they don’t want to cause an immediate backlog.

Geisthart says the release of Victory Vinyl is just phase one.

“Everything was done with an eye on future expansion,” Geisthart explained, “There will be future phases based on customer demand. Different colors, functions, extrusions – we will go wherever the customer wants,” he said. RB

  • Hits: 642

Plyco Energy Performance Thermal Break Doors

Analytics of Door Thermal Performance

When discussing the energy efficiencies of walk doors in post frame or “red iron” metal buildings many people assume there is not much of a differentiation between door types and therefore little thought is done for the entry doors.  In other words, the thinking is that most doors are very similar in construction, gauges, and door cores, so there is no need to look at performance or tested data results.

Plyco has historically been very aggressive for third party testing and registration for many of its doors.  In more recent times, due to energy costs and clean climate objectives a greater emphasis is now on thermal performance.  This makes sense – every building owner or homeowner should be concerned about the insulating properties of the building envelope. 

Those that do look at each category in more detail find ways to provide higher performing products and walk doors are no different.  The starting point for door would be the door panel itself.  Common exterior doors use a styrene core which has an R value of 4-6.  Better or “best” doors will have a poured in place polyurethane core, which because of it being liquid at the time of application fills all the door cavities and ultimately typically more than doubles the R value to about 12.  But that is only a portion of the story.  The weather seal, threshold/sweep, and “fit” will also play a big role in the amount of air or water infiltration.  All of this is captured in much greater way with the NFRC 100 testing for the entire door system, which also provides a much better indication of real-world results. 

Why is this more comprehensive U value important?  Well, you can quantify the impact of higher U values when using high performance windows and doors.  The U value of the NFRC 100 testing is the value that can be used in RESCHECK and COMCHECK for the building envelope.  For example, using ASHRAE 90.1-2016 for climate zone 5, the prescriptive U value for walls is 0.050 and for doors it’s 0.68.  There are several variables to input that will adjust results but in general, using a 0.24 U value for the Plyco 92 Series thermal break door system, the benefit of just (2) doors in a 15’ x 100’ wall could generate the reduced need for wall insulation by 34%.  So there could be significant cost savings on the front end, but maybe more importantly leaving the initial R value insulation in place, the energy efficiency of the building is substantially increased. 

How does the Plyco 92 door achieve such high tested U values?  The 92 door has an “Everlast” G60 galvanized, pre-painted steel door panel with a poured in place polyurethane core, along with a heavy extruded full aluminum “storefront” type of frame.  The door, frame, and threshold all have a “true” polyurethane thermal break barrier which provides the basis for the tremendous U values.

The Plyco 92 series thermal door system is now available in Black utilizing “Cool Solar Reflective Technology” to further enhance the door quality and building performance.

Summary: the world of energy efficiency of doors can be a bit complicated. Testing and performance level minimums are a good starting point to ensure basic structural requirements are met.  Then the energy efficiencies gained through highly engineered products – especially those with a thermal break door and frame - that provide strong U values are becoming more and more necessary.  More information can be provided by contacting Tom Granitz at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

  • Hits: 681